Maryland Enacts a Statewide "Ban-the-Box" Law
During the 2019 legislative session, Governor Larry Hogan vetoed the Criminal Records Screening (or "Ban-the-Box") Act. On January 30, 2020, however, the Maryland General Assembly overrode the governor's veto, making it unlawful for any employer in the State of Maryland with 15 or more employees to inquire into an applicant's criminal history before the employer conducts its first in-person interview. The law takes effect on February 29, 2020. Importantly, the law does not preempt the more restrictive ban-the-box ordinances enacted in Montgomery County, Prince George's County, and Baltimore City.
The State Ban-the-Box Law
Must all employers, regardless of size, comply with the new law?
No. The law applies to employers with 15 or more full-time employees. The statutory language does not further define employer coverage.
What is an employer restricted from doing?
The law prohibits employers from asking applicants whether they have a "criminal record" or have been accused of a crime before the first in-person interview. The employer, however, may require the applicant to disclose such information during the first in-person interview. In other words, an employer may no longer inquire about an applicant's criminal history on a job application or during a phone interview.
The law defines "criminal record" to mean an arrest; a guilty plea or verdict; a nolo contendere plea; a disposition of probation before judgment; a disposition of "not criminally responsible"; or a marking of a charge "stet" on the docket. The law does not define what it means for an applicant to have been accused of a crime.
Are there any exceptions?
Yes. An employer may inquire about criminal history at any time if:
- another federal or state law requires or authorizes the employer to inquire into an applicant's criminal history; or
- the employer provides services or care to minors or vulnerable adults.
Are there penalties for non-compliance or retaliation?
Yes. The law prohibits employers from discriminating or retaliating against an applicant or employee for claiming the employer violated the statute. The law allows aggrieved individuals to submit written complaints to the Maryland Commissioner of Labor and Industry. If the Commissioner finds that an employer violated the statute, the Commissioner will issue an order compelling compliance, and may assess a civil penalty of up to $300 per applicant should the employer subsequently violate the statute.
What are the more restrictive requirements in the local ban-the-box ordinances?
Like Maryland's law, Montgomery County's ordinance applies to employers with 15 or more employees. Baltimore's ordinance, in contrast, applies to employers with 10 or more employees; Prince George's County's ordinance applies to employers with 25 or more employees.
The ordinances in Montgomery County and Prince George's County allow criminal history inquiries only after the first interview. This is more restrictive because the state-wide law permits an employer to inquire about criminal history during the first interview.
Baltimore's ordinance is the most restrictive because it prohibits an employer from inquiring into an applicant's criminal history until after the employer makes a conditional offer of employment to the applicant.
Another difference between Maryland's ban-the-box law and the local ordinances relates to notice requirements to applicants. For those employers in Montgomery County and Prince George's County, the ordinances require employers to provide pre- and final adverse action notices to applicants when the employer intends to withdraw a conditional offer of employment based on the applicant's criminal history. Baltimore's ordinance, like Maryland's law, contains no pre- or final adverse action notice requirement.
Are there any other related laws to consider?
Yes. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has issued enforcement guidance relating to an employer's use of an individual's criminal history in making employment decisions. In sum, in assessing whether an employer has violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Commission considers whether the inquiry is "job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity."
Moreover, if an employer conducts a background credit check, it must comply with both the: (1) federal Fair Credit Reporting Act requirements, including the FCRA's initial notice, authorization, pre-adverse action and adverse action notice requirements; and (2) Maryland's Job Applicant Fairness Act.
Next Steps for Maryland Employers
Maryland employers should remove questions about criminal history from their job applications and revise their hiring procedures to delay any inquiry about criminal history until the first in-person interview. If the employer is located in Montgomery County, Prince George's County, or Baltimore City, however, the employer must provide locally required notices and delay criminal history inquiries as discussed above.
© 2020 Littler Mendelson. All Rights Reserved. LITTLER MENDELSON®, ASAP®, INSIGHT® and LITTLER REPORT® are registered trademarks of Littler Mendelson, P.C.
Posted: February 7, 2020
All Rights Reserved © 2020 Truescreen, Inc.
This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.
The service you provide at Truescreen has been the best I have ever seen in comparison to other vendors I have worked with in the past! You guys rock!
I am very impressed with your company’s customer service, and the Truescreen portal seems to be an intuitive, user-friendly design.
Our team loves working with Truescreen and the expedient, thorough service and results we get from you.
I appreciate all your hard work ensuring that individuals are cleared through our processes. Truescreen makes my job so much easier and less stressful.